KNOWLEDGE is POWER / REAL NEWS is KEY
New York: Wednesday, May 21, 2025
© 2025 U-S-NEWS.COM
Online Readers: 336 (random number)
New York: Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Online: 318 (random number)
Join our "Free Speech Social Platform ONGO247.COM" Click Here
Supreme Court Rules 9-0 in FOURTH AMENDMENT Case
Home
Politics
POLITICS: Supreme Court Rules 9-0 in FOURTH AMENDMENT Case – Video

POLITICS: Supreme Court Rules 9-0 in FOURTH AMENDMENT Case – Video

Politics
··1 min read·



🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel


🇺🇸 Try Epoch Times Sale: https://bit.ly/4lAyebk

🟡 Buy One Gold Oz., Get One Silver Oz.: https://ept.ms/3biH9MN

Episode Resources:

🔵 Supreme Court Ruling:

https://bit.ly/3SHoWwS



🔵 Fifth Circuit Ruling:

See also

https://bit.ly/3FkhdSt

🔵 Full Dashcam Footage:

https://bit.ly/3ZoL7M4

–
#4thamendment #FactsMatter #supremecourt
© All Rights Reserved.



source

Join us on Telegram


OnGo247
New 100% Free
Social Platform
ONGO247.COM
Give it a spin!
Sign Up Today
OnGo247
New 100% Free
Social Platform
ONGO247.COM
Give it a spin!
Sign Up Today
Tags

What Do You Think?

00
Related
TheGunBox.com
Previous POLITICS: UK Mother Loses Appeal as Court Upholds Two Year Sentence for “Racist” Tweet – USSA News

20 Comments

  2. I think this makes it a bit difficult for police to do their job… they may not want to intervene or interfere in something if wen escalation occurs they ppl may say the officer put themselves in the position…

    Reply

  4. Did the young man have the right to drive away with the officer hanging out of his car? That is a key question that will answer whether the officer had the right to kill the driver. I would bet that the young man had no right to drive away with the officer hanging out of his car whether the entry was lawfull or not because in doing so the young man put the officers life and limb in danger.

    Reply

  5. What I think is that there are way too many instances where police believe “officer safety” overrides unalienable rights. And that officer digression was abused.
    But I do not believe that this will change any officer behavior, they are not trained well enough that Terry v Ohio has not sufficiently changed behavior. It is most department’s policy to violate “reasonable articulable suspicion OF A CRIME” and demand ID for any contact. And way too many officers are completely ignorant of the first amendment and still see a citizen exercising the second amendment right to legally open carry as reasonable suspicion to stop, detain, search and seize.

    Reply

  8. The "moment of danger" clause is ridiculous on its face. So as long as they intentionally escalate something and put themselves in danger, it becomes legal no matter how unconstitutional it is?
    No wonder the SCOTUS was unanimously against it.

    Reply

  10. I don’t like the fact that the moment is not allowed to judge the eminent danger of the officer. This will also be allowed to judge self defense cases where an innocent person is not allowed to make split second decisions in defending their own life and the lives of family or even perceived innocent strangers. This young man was killed because he chose to attempt evasion and did not consider the life of the officer by taking this action. Very poor Supreme Court decision that will affect millions of civilians negatively by holding them to this same standard in every self defense case. Forcing them to choose hesitating thus endangering their life or prison for every defensive action. This is net lose to the population as a whole by saying to the criminal that they will not be judged for their stupid decisions to endanger others lives. In my opinion this was a purely emotional court decision. If their son was killed in an evasive chase, they would still be presenting the same standards against the officer, however more innocent persons would be subject to endangerment by the drivers actions.

    Reply

  14. Everyone likes to think they're a Judge even though they never studied law, if that's true then NO one has to study law at all to become a Judge,
    If you Agree with the Judges decision then you say, the Judge Got It Right, if you Disagree then you say the Judge Got It Wrong, WHAT A LAUGH.

    Reply

  15. I don’t like the fact that the moment is not allowed to judge the eminent danger of the officer. This will also be allowed to judge self defense cases where an innocent person is not allowed to make split second decisions in defending their own life and the lives of family or even perceived innocent strangers. This young man was killed because he chose to attempt evasion and did not consider the life of the officer by taking this action. Very poor Supreme Court decision that will affect millions of civilians negatively by holding them to this same standard in every self defense case. Forcing them to choose hesitating thus endangering their life or prison for every defensive action. This is net lose to the population as a whole by saying to the criminal that they will not be judged for their stupid decisions to endanger others lives. In my opinion this was a purely emotional court decision. If their son was killed in an evasive chase, they would still be presenting the same standards against the officer, however more innocent persons would be subject to endangerment by the drivers actions.

    Reply

  19. THANK GOD !! It's about time perspectives from ALL SIDES known are considered whenever a human life can be altered by an oversight of that ability !
    Crap like this "forced perspective" is helping A.I. learn about ( and learn to circumvent ) the flaws of humanity. ⚠️ PAY ATTENTION ⚠️

    Reply

  20. There's some degree of double edged sword here.
    But it's mostly good for citizens.
    Agents of the law need to be held accountable when they CREATE dangerous situations for themselves.

    Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HELP! I'm down here in the swamp!
Welcome. You now reached the bottom, exactly like
JOE BIDEN
Commander in Thief
HELP! I'm down here in the swamp!
Welcome. You now reached the bottom, exactly like
JOE BIDEN
Commander in Thief
© U-S-NEWS.COM - Real News is Key