π΄ Website π https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram π https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
Prince Harry is considering pulling the plug on his rumored upcoming trip to London, according to reports.
The Duke of Sussex, 39, was reportedly gearing up to jet off to his home soil in May to celebrate theΒ 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games.
But according to insiders, Harry is concerned over his own safety after being stripped of taxpayer-funded security protection in the UK.
Sources claim that the father of two is now looking into appearing via video link or a pre-recorded message instead.
βWhenever Harry travels to the UK, his trips are always dependent on how secure he is,β a source told the Express.
βBefore deciding whether to attend the Invictus Games anniversary event, his security team must be sure that St. Paulβs is adequately protected by the metropolitan police and his own security needs are met while heβs in London.β
βHarry wants to spend more time in the UK with his family, but thereβs no way he can do that while a question mark hangs over his security detail,β the Duke added.
The insider added that Harry was left βextremely disappointedβ over his security in the UK β or lack thereof.
The Post has reached out to Harryβs reps for comment.
WhileΒ Harryβs rumored tripΒ is still unconfirmed, itβs believed that celebrations will take place at St. Paulβs Cathedral.
Itβs unclear if the trip will be yet another solo venture, following hot on the heels of his 24-hour dash in February.
That month, Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, 42, were stripped of funded police protectionΒ after they stepped back from being βworking royalsβ and moved to the US in 2020.
This means that the Sussexes will now have to pay out of pocket for their security when traveling across the pond.
Harryβs lawyers hadΒ sought a judicial reviewΒ of the governmentβs refusal of his offer to hire police officers as his private security detail, which wasΒ initially deniedΒ by Londonβs High Court in May 2023.
And earlier this month, Harry lost his bid to appeal London High Courtβs ruling in a final blow to his case.
Whatβs more, he was ordered to pay 90% of the UK Home Officeβs legal costs for defending the courtβs initial ruling.