🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
ICE agents are now arresting illegal immigrants at their court hearings as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem delivers on President Trump’s promise to end “catch and release” policies that allowed millions of undocumented migrants to remain in the country.
Key Takeaways
- DHS has officially ended the “catch and release” policy, replacing it with expedited removal procedures for illegal immigrants who entered within the last two years
- ICE agents are now arresting illegal immigrants directly at their court hearings, implementing immediate enforcement rather than allowing continued release
- The policy shift enables deportation without immigration court hearings for those without valid credible fear claims or pending cases
- Progressive groups are protesting the policy in sanctuary cities like Phoenix, claiming family separations are occurring
- The changes represent a direct reversal of Biden-era immigration policies and a return to stricter enforcement standards
Noem Delivers on Trump’s Border Promises
The Department of Homeland Security under Secretary Kristi Noem has taken decisive action to eliminate the controversial ‘catch and release’ immigration policy that has allowed millions of illegal immigrants to enter and remain in the United States while awaiting court proceedings. The new approach focuses on expedited removal for individuals who entered the country illegally within the past two years, representing a fundamental shift in how immigration laws are enforced at America’s borders and within communities.
“Secretary Noem is reversing Biden’s catch and release policy that allowed millions of unvetted illegal aliens to be let loose on American streets. This Administration is once again implementing the rule of law.” stated DHS to FOX.
The expedited removal process now being implemented allows for rapid deportation without requiring a hearing before an immigration judge, provided the individual has no active, pending immigration case. This marks a significant departure from previous practices where illegal immigrants were frequently released into the country with notices to appear at future court dates—appointments many failed to keep. Only those with valid credible fear claims will continue through standard immigration proceedings.
ICE Enforcement at Court Hearings
Perhaps the most visible aspect of the policy shift is the directive for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to arrest illegal immigrants directly at their court hearings. This tactical change eliminates the opportunity for those without legal status to disappear into American communities after court appearances. The enforcement strategy has already been implemented in multiple jurisdictions, with sanctuary cities like Phoenix experiencing increased immigration operations.
The new enforcement actions represent a complete reversal of Biden-era policies that had significantly limited ICE operations and deportation efforts. Under the previous administration, immigration enforcement was severely curtailed, with many illegal immigrants effectively protected from deportation despite clear violations of immigration law. Secretary Noem’s approach realigns enforcement priorities with existing statutory requirements and presidential directives to secure the border and enforce immigration laws.
Progressive Backlash and Protests
The strengthened enforcement actions have predictably triggered protests from progressive groups and immigrant advocates, particularly in sanctuary cities where local policies had previously shielded illegal immigrants from federal enforcement. In Phoenix, activists have staged demonstrations outside courthouses where ICE operations have been conducted, claiming that families are being separated and immigrants are being shamed through the enforcement process.
“We have seen over 20 families separated and rushed and funneled into vans, arrested in courtrooms, and shamed,” said Monica Sandshaper.
These criticisms highlight the stark policy differences between the current administration’s focus on law enforcement and border security versus the previous administration’s emphasis on humanitarian considerations that often came at the expense of immigration law enforcement. While progressive groups frame the operations as cruel, supporters of the policy point out that enforcement is simply the application of existing laws that went unenforced during the Biden years.
Legal Foundation and Challenges
The policy shift builds upon the legal framework established during President Trump’s first term, which sought to limit the use of parole and expand detention capabilities. The current approach further strengthens these measures through implementation of the Laken Riley Act, which mandates detention for undocumented immigrants accused of specific offenses and grants states the ability to sue the federal government for non-enforcement of immigration laws.
While the new policies are firmly grounded in the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions for expedited removal, they may face legal challenges related to the Flores Settlement Agreement, which requires that minors in immigration custody be held in the least restrictive setting and released without unnecessary delay. However, the administration appears prepared to defend its enforcement actions as necessary for national security and adherence to immigration law.
The end of catch and release represents a return to the rule of law in immigration enforcement and fulfills one of President Trump’s core campaign promises. As implementation continues, Americans can expect to see continued decreases in illegal border crossings and increases in deportations of those without legal authorization to remain in the country.