🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
It sounds like science fiction: “Could AI run for president?” But as someone who’s spent decades building software systems that prevent failure in high-stakes environments, I believe we’re approaching a moment when this question won’t sound ridiculous—it will sound inevitable.
By 2032, AI tools won’t just be answering our questions or drafting our emails. It will be deeply embedded in the systems that shape our lives: our healthcare, our education, our justice systems—and yes, even our governance. I’m not saying we’ll elect a robot to office. But I am saying that an AI might be the most impartial, consistent, and evidence-driven decision-maker in the room.
Let me explain.
Founder of Typemock, and the author of AICracy: Beyond Democracy.
What Software Taught Me About Broken Systems
Building software that anticipates failure taught me to look beyond surface-level issues and ask what’s really driving breakdowns—whether in code or in government. That’s what data and AI do best: find meaning in complexity.
Around 2019, I began to notice a deeply unsettling pattern—one that had nothing to do with code. Public trust in governments was collapsing. Democracies were paralyzed by short-term incentives, disinformation, and gridlock. Meanwhile, leadership decisions were increasingly detached from facts, drowning in emotion and noise.
I found myself asking the kind of question that gets you strange looks at dinner parties: What if AI could help us govern better than we govern ourselves?
AI Isn’t Perfect—But Neither Are We
When people talk about AI, they usually split into two camps: utopians who believe it will save us, and doomsayers who fear it will destroy us. But I’ve worked closely with AI systems. I know what they can do—and what they can’t.
AI doesn’t have desires. It doesn’t seek power. It doesn’t fear losing elections or gaining popularity. It doesn’t lie to protect its ego.
That’s not just a limitation. It’s also a strength.
Humans bring empathy, values, and creativity—but also bias, ego, and self-interest. AI, when designed ethically and transparently, brings clarity, consistency, and impartiality. It can help us make data-driven decisions that aren’t held hostage by emotion or lobbyists.
The realization hit me hard: for decades I’ve used technology to reduce failure in software. Couldn’t we use the same thinking to reduce failure in leadership?
What Changed My Thinking
I started imagining a governance model where AI doesn’t replace politicians—but augments them. A system where AI:
– Flags inconsistencies in laws.
– Predicts the impact of policy across different demographics.
– Helps allocate resources more equitably.
– Identifies disinformation in real time.
In short, AI wouldn’t run the world. It would help us run it better.
That’s why I coined the term AICracy—a system where AI assists governance with transparency and ethical guardrails, proposing evidence-based ideas for human leaders to shape, debate, and vote on. It’s not automation of politics. It’s optimization of decision-making.
What I’ve Learned—and What You Can Take Away
Over the years, I’ve come to believe that AI won’t undermine leadership—it will elevate it, if we let it. Here are a few principles I live by:
1) AI is only as good as the humans guiding it
Like steel, AI can build bridges or swords. It’s up to us to embed values, ethics, and context into the system.
2) Don’t see AI as a competitor—see it as an amplifier
It won’t replace human intuition. But it can scale clarity and reduce noise in overwhelmed systems.
3) Fairness is a systems challenge, not just a moral one
AI can analyze patterns of inequality and help us intervene—if we’re bold enough to use it.
4) AI can’t make moral decisions—but it can support more moral systems
Human oversight is critical. The goal isn’t to escape responsibility, but to deepen it—with better tools.
Where It’s All Headed
Out of curiosity, I recently asked ChatGPT and Gemini how they envision themselves evolving by 2032. Their answers startled me—not because they were outlandish, but because they aligned with what I already suspected:
By then, AI will be more transparent, accountable, and aligned with human values. It will help governments, companies, and communities reason across massive complexity in real time. It won’t just provide answers—it will become a collaborator in solving society’s hardest problems.
The question won’t be “Can AI govern?”
It will be: “Why would we keep governing without it?”
We’re not electing an AI president—yet. But by 2032, we may trust one to help us decide how to govern better. That, to me, is not far-fetched. It’s necessary.
We list the best AI chatbot for business.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro