POLITICS: Trump announces initial U.S. ground attack on Venezuelan drug hub – USSA News

In a radio interview last Friday, President Donald Trump confirmed that American forces carried out their first-ever land strike on a smuggling operation deep in Venezuelan territory, a bold move against the narco-traffickers tied to dictator Nicolas Maduro. This isn’t just a policy update; it’s a signal of a tougher stance on drug networks plaguing our hemisphere.

Here’s the crux: Trump revealed during a surprise call to a radio show that U.S. forces neutralized a key smuggling facility in Venezuela, marking a significant escalation in his campaign against drug trafficking in the region.

Tracing Trump’s Aggressive Anti-Drug Campaign

Let’s rewind to set the stage. Since September, Trump has been green-lighting strikes on drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific, showing he’s not messing around when it comes to curbing narco-terrorism. His focus on Venezuela, under Maduro’s iron grip, has been particularly sharp.

By late November, the hints were dropping like breadcrumbs. Trump started signaling that ground operations against Venezuelan smugglers weren’t just a possibility—they were on the horizon. On Thanksgiving Day, he told military personnel via phone that land actions to deter drug traffickers would kick off soon.

Fast forward to December 11, and Trump doubled down, telling White House reporters that land operations were “going to be starting pretty soon.” That’s not vague campaign rhetoric; it’s a promise of boots on the ground—or at least targeted strikes. And for communities near U.S. borders, the ripple effects of drug trafficking hit home with higher crime and health care costs from addiction crises.

Strike Details Emerge in Surprise Call

Then came the bombshell last Friday during a radio chat with billionaire businessman and host John Catsimatidis on WABC. Trump, calling in unexpectedly, casually noted that the first ground strike on a Venezuelan smuggling hub had already happened two nights prior. That’s 13 days after his December 11 tease, if the timeline holds.

Here’s Trump in his own words: “I don’t know if you read or you saw, they have a big plant or a big facility where they send the — where the ships come from. Two nights ago we knocked that out — so we hit them very hard,” he told Catsimatidis. Now, isn’t that classic Trump—straight talk with a punch, though light on specifics?

But let’s not sip the Kool-Aid just yet. While Trump’s swagger suggests a major win, he didn’t spill the beans on where this facility was, how it was hit, or what exactly it did in the drug trade. That opacity leaves room for skeptics to question whether this is more show than substance.

Lack of Confirmation Raises Eyebrows

The New York Times backed up Trump’s claim, reporting that U.S. officials confirmed a strike occurred. Yet, they too played coy, offering no details on the site’s location, the attack method, or its role in trafficking. As the Times noted, “U.S. officials declined to specify anything about the site the president said was hit, where it was located, how the attack was carried out, or what role the facility played in drug trafficking.”

Here’s the kicker from the same report: “There has been no public report of an attack from the Venezuelan government or any other authorities in the region.” If Maduro’s regime isn’t even acknowledging this, are we dealing with a silent victory or a story still unfolding? For conservatives, this gap screams for transparency—our military deserves credit, but we need the full picture.

See also

Politics

·12/19/2025·0

POLITICS: Maryland governor’s administration under fire for automatically deleting records – USSA News

This silence from Caracas is telling, or perhaps telling of nothing. Maduro’s government isn’t exactly known for candor, so their mute response could mean the strike was a pinpoint hit—or that they’re just playing possum. Either way, American parents worried about drugs flooding into schools want proof that this action made a dent.

Conservative Call for Accountability

From a right-of-center view, Trump’s move is a refreshing push against the soft-on-crime policies that too often coddle narco-thugs under the guise of “root causes.” But let’s not wave the flag blindly—every military action must be measured against its cost to our treasury and its real impact on drug flows. If this strike doesn’t slow the poison crossing our borders, it’s just theater.

For retirees on fixed incomes, the financial burden of sustained operations abroad is no small matter. We’re talking potential tax hikes or diverted funds from Social Security if these missions balloon without oversight. Conservatives must demand Congress keep a hawk’s eye on this, ensuring it’s not just a flashy headline.

So, where do we stand? Trump’s first land strike in Venezuela is a gutsy step against narco-terrorism, but the jury’s out on whether it’s a game-changer or a costly gesture. Here’s hoping for more clarity—and real results—because American families deserve nothing less than a safer, stronger nation.

The post Trump announces initial U.S. ground attack on Venezuelan drug hub appeared first on Conservative Institute.