🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
Robert McBride, the second-ranking federal prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia, was abruptly fired on Monday in a move that has raised eyebrows across legal circles.
McBride, who had only been in the role of first assistant U.S. Attorney for a few months, was terminated after declining to assist in the Justice Department’s prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey, according to a source familiar with the matter as reported by CBS News.
The case against Comey, tied to indictments from last fall for alleged false testimony to Congress in 2020, was dismissed in November by a federal judge who ruled interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan’s appointment unlawful, a decision now under appeal by the Justice Department.
The issue has sparked intense debate over the independence of federal prosecutors and the political undercurrents shaping high-profile cases.
McBride’s Background and Sudden Exit
McBride, a seasoned legal mind, previously served as a longtime federal prosecutor in Kentucky’s Eastern District before moving into private practice in the state, CBS reported.
His career also includes service in the U.S. Navy’s Judge Advocate General’s Corps, showcasing a dedication to public service that makes his sudden dismissal all the more jarring.
A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Eastern Virginia declined to comment on the firing, leaving many questions unanswered about the internal dynamics at play.
Comey Case Sparks Legal Controversy
The prosecution of Comey, often seen as a target of President Trump’s frustration with perceived political adversaries, began last fall with two counts tied to alleged false statements to Congress.
Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, personally selected by Trump for the role, secured the indictments without input from career prosecutors, who reportedly stepped back due to concerns over insufficient evidence.
Halligan’s predecessor had also refused to pursue charges against Comey or New York Attorney General Letitia James, citing a similar lack of proof, which only deepens the perception of a politically charged agenda.
Judicial Ruling Upends Prosecution Efforts
In November, a federal judge threw out the charges against both Comey and James, ruling that Halligan’s appointment did not meet legal standards.
The Justice Department is now appealing that decision, but the legal complexities grow murkier—especially in Comey’s case, where the statute of limitations expired mere days after the initial indictment.
Attempts to re-indict James have failed twice since Halligan’s disqualification, signaling that the road ahead for these cases is anything but smooth.
Political Motivations or Legal Integrity?
Let’s be frank: when career prosecutors refuse to touch a case due to weak evidence, yet a hand-picked interim attorney barrels ahead, it smells like politics over principle.
McBride’s firing for declining to join this legal crusade raises a fair question—shouldn’t prosecutors have the freedom to say ‘no’ when the evidence doesn’t stack up, without fearing the axe?
The post Top Virginia federal prosecutor dismissed over refusal to prosecute former FBI Director Comey appeared first on Conservative Institute.
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://conservativeinstitute.org and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.