🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
Syria’s new government has dispatched its foreign minister to Moscow in a desperate bid to salvage relations with Russia after ousting the Kremlin’s longtime ally Bashar al-Assad, marking a stunning reversal that exposes the fragile nature of Middle Eastern alliances.
At a Glance
- Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani met with Russian officials in Moscow on July 31, 2025
- Talks focused on future of Russian military bases and regional influence post-Assad
- Russia proposed turning Hmeimim and Tartus into “humanitarian hubs”
- Sectarian violence has surged across Syria, targeting multiple minority groups
- September elections could determine legitimacy of Syria’s new transitional leadership
Post-Assad Diplomacy
In a dramatic pivot from years of hostility, Syria’s interim government has begun outreach to Moscow mere months after toppling Russian-backed strongman Bashar al-Assad. Asaad al-Shaibani’s diplomatic mission to Moscow represents a delicate attempt to reset relations while avoiding the appearance of submission to a former patron. This visit, occurring on July 31, 2025, marks the first such engagement since Assad’s ouster, with Syria’s new leadership under Ahmed al-Sharaa keenly aware that Russia remains a regional player, albeit one with diminished clout.
Watch now: On Cam: Russia & Syria Signal Closer Ties Amid Drama Over Military Bases · YouTube
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov welcomed the overture with cautious optimism, underscoring the need for inclusive elections and minority protections—a veiled reminder of Moscow’s remaining leverage. With parliamentary elections looming in mid-September, Russia is signaling its interest in shaping Syria’s future, even as its ability to dictate terms wanes. The gesture of “mutual respect” stands in sharp contrast to the Kremlin’s prior dictatorial alignment with Assad, hinting at a more transactional era in Russo-Syrian ties.
Bases for Bargaining
At the core of these talks lies a contentious issue: the fate of Russia’s strategic military footholds in Syria. The Hmeimim airbase and Tartus naval facility, once symbols of Russian dominance in the region, now stand as relics of a bygone era. Russia’s proposal to repurpose them as “humanitarian hubs” is both a tactical retreat and a strategic gambit—a means of maintaining presence under the guise of goodwill.
Damascus, meanwhile, is weighing its options. With regional and Western powers expressing interest in Syria’s rebuilding process, the interim leadership holds considerable leverage. Defense Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra has reportedly insisted on reevaluating all Assad-era agreements, leaving open the possibility of either conditional renewal or total expulsion of Russian forces. Moscow’s rebranding of its installations as humanitarian reflects an implicit admission of its weakened bargaining position.
Ethnic Fault Lines Reopen
As diplomatic engagements unfold, the reality on the ground remains perilous. Sectarian violence has spiked in recent months, with minorities such as Druze, Alawites, Christians, and Kurds facing targeted attacks. The collapse of Assad’s regime, long seen as a bulwark—however repressive—against Islamist factions, has left many communities exposed amid a power vacuum.
Russia has sought to capitalize on this chaos, vocally condemning recent Israeli airstrikes in Syria and aligning itself with Syrian sovereignty concerns. Lavrov used the Moscow talks to stress the urgency of protecting minority groups, framing Russia not just as a military stakeholder but a defender of pluralism. Whether this narrative resonates in Damascus—or merely serves as a rhetorical shield for continued presence—remains to be seen.
Fragile Reset in a Fractured Region
Syria’s recalibrated engagement with Moscow marks a pivotal moment in regional diplomacy. With Assad gone, longstanding alliances have crumbled, and new power centers are emerging. The new Syrian leadership must simultaneously appease wary domestic factions, court potential international partners, and manage adversaries-turned-negotiators. The tightrope is perilous.
Al-Shaibani’s statement following the Moscow meetings struck a hopeful tone, praising dialogue as a step toward unity and sovereignty. But optimism belies the deeper geopolitical gamble at play: Syria is testing whether a post-revolutionary state can preserve agency while reengaging with the very actors that enabled its former despot. The coming elections—and the fate of Russia’s military outposts—will reveal if this strategy can hold under pressure or unravel under the weight of history.
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://deepstatetribunal.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.