KNOWLEDGE is POWER / REAL NEWS is KEY
New York: Friday, October 17, 2025
© 2025 U-S-NEWS.COM
Online Readers: 341 (random number)
New York: Friday, October 17, 2025
Online: 307 (random number)
Join our "Free Speech Social Platform ONGO247.COM" Click Here
New Ban on GLOCKS Runs Straight into Supreme Court Precedent
Home
Politics
POLITICS: New Ban on GLOCKS Runs Straight into Supreme Court Precedent – Video

POLITICS: New Ban on GLOCKS Runs Straight into Supreme Court Precedent – Video

Politics
··1 min read·



🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel


🇺🇸 Try The Epoch Times here: https://ept.ms/RomanSale

📱 Switch to Patriot Mobile: https://ept.ms/46jIA6Z

Episode Resources:

🔵 California New Law:

https://bit.ly/3KQ42eB



🔵 Heller Decision:

See also

https://bit.ly/3WFlRzt

🔵 Bruen Decision:

https://bit.ly/3KWI8WU

–
#2ndamendment #california #factsmatter
© All Rights Reserved.



source

Join us on Telegram


OnGo247
New 100% Free
Social Platform
ONGO247.COM
Give it a spin!
Sign Up Today
OnGo247
New 100% Free
Social Platform
ONGO247.COM
Give it a spin!
Sign Up Today
Tags

What Do You Think?

00
Related
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference announcing $11 insulin and prescription drugs with the CalRX program inside a Cedars-Sinai pharmacy in Los Angeles, California.
Previous Travel & Lifestyle: California’s Cheaper, State-Made Insulin Will Be Available Soon

29 Comments

  4. Theres a kind of sabotage that leftists engage in by jamming up the courts with absurd laws so they have to be adjudicated to dismiss them. Its intentional.

    Reply

  5. Im sure it will come up that affixing an electronic trigger pull repeater to the trigger guard turns any semi auto, or double action revolver, into an automatic. So what makes glock unique? The form of the mechanism attached? Based on what? This will be defeated and they know it, but they are willing to waste millions in tax money for a virtue signal trial.

    Reply

  6. Laws like this, where SCOTUS has already spelled it out for the slow politicians, should instantly be thrown out by SCOTUS. And fine the state for wasting their time.

    Reply

  7. When the 2nd amendment was added, the people had the exact same weapons as the military barring artillery. The founding fathers were good with this! These laws are the exact tyranny they gave us the right to defend ourselves from!

    Reply

  11. Courts let Newsom get away with what he gets away with. SCOTUS will look the other way on this one too. They have taken up a carry case out of Hawaii so my bet is thats the only 2a case they will take up this year. That means welcome to years of litigation on the Glock ban.

    Reply

  12. California restricts everything firearm related, this includes ammunition, magazines and weapons that are scary to them. Restricting the law-abiding is dems way of insuring victims aren't a threat to armed criminals.

    Reply

  14. WHY BAN THE GLOCK?

    WHY NOT CRIMINALIZE THE USE OF CONVERSION KITS FOR THE GLOCK?

    IT'S SOUNDS LIKE IF YOU DONT CONVERT IT, IT THEN BECOMES A REGULAR GUN.

    Reply

  18. How about a law criminalizing politicians from taking bribes, political contributions, and gifts from Special Interests and corporations. And, reporting Shell Corporations located in foreign countries!

    Reply

  20. The most “ common use “ handgun in the nation. Defying Supreme Court ruling. All striker fire handgun falls under this ban. This is another bs bill based on bs narrative. California also has a 10 round mag law capacity. Doesn’t make sense.

    Reply

  21. It doesn't matter what a modification can do. It matters what a firearm is when purchased. Not everyone wants to modify or even knows how to modify a firearm. I personally don't have any desire to have anything that fires full auto. In fact I don't have any interest in modern firearms and find antique firearms far more interesting personally. But that doesn't mean those that are interested in modern firearms should have their right to purchase or own a specific firearm violated. The 2nd Amendment is absolutely crystal clear. " Shall not be infringed " can only be mistaken or ignored when violating the 2nd Amendment. Newsom and the Democrats controlling California are constantly violating the rights of Californians

    Reply

  23. Awwwhhhhhhh Roman, I just enjoy your posts whenever you come on. I get so much out of your informative posts about what's going on in the World, Thanks for all you do and You Be Good

    Reply

  25. At first Calif. Commies let you keep your high capacity magazines that were outlawed. Then they outlawed those grandfathered in high capacity (aka anything that holds more than 10 bullets) magazines. So, it will be with Glocks. They will let you keep the one you have, then the Calif. Commie Lunatics will outlaw the Glocks you already have.. That is how Nazis roll. Newscom is a Nazis lunatic, and he wants to bring his dumb ideas to the whole of the USA!

    Reply

  26. The Constitution never defined “arms.” If we’re being originalists, as many conservatives claim to be, “arms” in 1791 meant muskets, pistols, and swords — not Glocks or AR-15s. Expanding that meaning is judicial activism, not strict constitutionalism.
    Even the Supreme Court has recognized limits: U.S. v. Miller (1939) ruled not all weapons are protected, and District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) upheld bans on “dangerous and unusual” arms. We already exclude bombs, chemical weapons, and missiles. Where to draw that line isn’t a constitutional question — it’s one for lawmakers.

    Reply

  28. This is the only thing that matters. Which is the constitution is the Supreme law of the land. which means. The constitution supercedes the authority of all 50 states and every branch of government. Does everyone understand that . Now with that said no one has the constitutional authority to ban, limit, restrict, or take away our right to keep and bare arms. Now arms is defined as any weapon that can be used for offense or defense. the first 10 amendments in the bill of rights is literally laying out the limits. Of the governments authority. and legislators only have the authority to make laws that are within the limitations of the first ten amendments, and any law that falls outside these amendments is a act of usurpation, and if any law enforcement agency that enforces such laws is also a act of usurpation. as well as a judge ruling in favor of such laws. so what are we supposed to do ? were supposed to refuse to comply and immediately start protesting.and literally let them know were not complying. This is the correct response….fighting crap like this in court is a waste of time and money.. Everyone should have been protesting

    Reply

  29. they do this knowing it will take away rights for years until it gets to a court to over turn it. They will never stop. Been doing it for MANY years

    Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HELP! I'm down here in the swamp!
Welcome. You now reached the bottom, exactly like
JOE BIDEN
Commander in Thief
HELP! I'm down here in the swamp!
Welcome. You now reached the bottom, exactly like
JOE BIDEN
Commander in Thief
© U-S-NEWS.COM - Real News is Key