POLITICS: Lawyers for defendants who are charged with counter-narrative influence are now also being targeted as the revolution advances: Links 1 for Sept. 6, 2025 – USSA News

1. Brilliantly done

2. In terms of the modus operandi of the communist revolution, it seems consistent that those with influence who hold or advocate or are otherwise useful to the counter-revolution will face both systemic and unofficial persecution. Either by what Stephen C would call “anti-state” proxies like ANTIFA (although at this point in Canada at least, the state is a revolutionary state) or by the machinery of state itself.

Examples are easy. In Canada, we have Helen Grus, found guilty of doing an investigation which has “societal or political consequences” as stated by the hearings officer, and of course the various convoy related charges for people who are guilty of orders of magnitude less than the antisemitic and anti-Israel protestors that take over streets across Canada multiple times a week.

We see over and over again, the system being used to destroy people who truthfully or not, oppose state narratives. This was extremely obvious during Covid and the vaxx mandates.

Saul Alinsky rule 13 from Rules for Radicals:

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

In a republic, truth is more important than the consequences of that truth to the state.

Also we had the right to a defence and the lawyers who defended their clients were understood to be advocates for an intimidating and complex system and was necessary. As Ben Franklin famously;y said, “Anyone who defends themselves has a fool for a lawyer”.

If you add up these issues you get to a proper understanding of this:

Prominent conservative lawyer in Canada disbarred in ‘vindictive abuse of process’

John Carpay, founder of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, has been banned for life from practicing law in Alberta after trying to hold a judge accountable for COVID

CALGARY, Alberta (LifeSiteNews) — John Carpay, one of Canada’s most high-profile constitutional lawyers who fought COVID mandates of all kinds and who also founded the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), has been disbarred from practicing law in Alberta in what he says was a “vindictive” manner.

This Tuesday, a hearing committee meeting for the Law Society of Alberta issued its ruling relating to Carpay, alleging that his past conduct included a serious breach regarding professional ethics. As a result, he was disbarred from practicing as a lawyer.

The Law Society said Carpay was “sanctioned for failing to discharge all of his responsibilities to his client, tribunals, the public, and other members of the profession honourably and with integrity.”

He was told to pay $7,457.50 in related costs and was “disbarred effective immediately.”

The reasons for Carpay’s disbarment come from an incident that occurred in 2021, when he hired a private investigator to tail a Manitoba judge to determine whether he was complying with COVID dictates.

I think that says it all. He was counter-narrative and actually defended several of the political prisoner Freedom Convoy people charged with mischief.

Also the amount of the fine is revealing. The 50 cents is likely to make it look like it was actually carefully calculated to reflect real damages.

Let’s have a listen to a talk Attorney Carpay gave near Ottawa last year:

An Alberta doctor who, it appears at least, has been very successfully treating hopeless cases of cancer with inexpensive and proven safe medications such as Ivermectin and Mebendazole has been persecuted by the province of Alberta state apparatus as well. First according to his internet postings, the Province of Alberta has been working to make Ivermectin illegal there. The question might arise, how does that change anything as everyone I know that chose of their own free will to treat Covid with it had to obtain it by finding a dealer somewhere. So the practical effect of this is questionable in some ways. But now Alberta is forcing him to remove Dr. and MD from his social media profiles.

This combination of events certainly brings into question the nature of the apparently counter-revolutionary government of Daniel Smith. Is she controlled op? Or does she simply not have access to the levers of power required to actually steer Alberta back to a republic style polity that all of Canada was more or less till the last 20 years or so.

In a recent talk in Pembroke, Dr. Shoemaker was specifically asked about this at around 19 minutes into the video below, and he explained that yes, Alberta was somehow in the process of making Ivermectin illegal, but as of August. 24th 2025 had not done it yet.

I do feel I must update this post with the following video:

It was Alberta RCMP that threw residents out of a town over a flood, then proceeded to identify every home that had a gun, using an illegally obtained list that was banned by federal law, and then looted those homes of those guns. That was well before Danielle Smith was at the helm. Ideally she will rid Alberta of the RCMP altogether and hopefully the federal government of Canada and create a proper constitutional Republic.

Also if the police were able to enter homes, search them and steal people’s legally acquired firearms, was the flood really bad enough to justify forcing people out of their homes?

3. Counter-narrative teacher fined massive sums for refusing to use pronouns

Reposting the speech by Ontario Renfrew County District School teacher, Matt Alexander on being fired for refusing to “celebrate and affirm” narrative attacks on normalcy.

Matt and his wife are both represented by John Carpay.