🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
The Issue: The FBI probe of six Democrats who urged military members to refuse illegal orders.
The six Democrats who urged service members to disobey what they call “illegal orders” should all be censured, at the very least (“Dems in for a battle,” Nov. 26).
Dems have gone so far off the deep end in their psychotic hatred of President Trump that somehow, they feel justified in making seditious statements like this.
Since military recruitment has been increasing, it would seem that the heroes in our military would beg to differ with these fools.
Robert DiNardo
Farmingdale
The Dems’ latest political stunt was to warn our troops to not follow unlawful orders, creating further grist for the Trump Derangement Syndrome mill. However, what those Democrats did was not sedition.
Our troops know not to follow unlawful orders — they’re indoctrinated in this throughout their careers. As a cadet at West Point, I was told not to follow unlawful orders in my mandatory law course. Those instructors weren’t committing sedition by telling me this.
One of the greatest lessons of the Second World War was that having to “follow orders” does not excuse one’s crimes. This is not rocket science. It’s just politicians doing another of the many reprehensible things they do.
Charles Michael Sitero
Ormond Beach, Fla.
Well, if Democrats are urging our military personnel to ignore and disobey orders from the president, I think it’s only fair to make a counter-offer.
When a Democratic-controlled Congress tells the American people they’re raising our taxes, our response should be: We won’t pay it. Go pound sand.
Myron Hecker
Pearl River
Sen. Mark Kelly using his naval service to protect himself from the consequences of his words is disgraceful.
I’m a former senior naval officer (23 years of active service). One of my responsibilities was to train subordinates in such things as “legal orders.”
Kelly’s words now make this work harder. I’m ashamed that I ever wore the same uniform he did.
Rocco P. Cascone Jr.
Staten Island
For all who called upon the military to refuse to follow illegal orders, there can only be one response: Arrest and prosecution.
Ken Karcinell
Hewlett
The Issue: Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s claim that Lee Zeldin accepted donations from the late Jeffrey Epstein.
Rep. Jasmine Crockett looked to ridicule EPA head Lee Zeldin and many others with their connections to Jeffrey Epstein, only to have it backfire (“Wrong Epstein’s plan for payback,” Nov. 22).
Then, in her usual condescending voice, she tried to walk it back by saying this wasn’t the Jeffrey Epstein that she was referring to. She said it, and she lied — end of story. This is who we have representing us in government.
Lorraine Fittipaldi
Apollo Beach, Fla.
Clueless airhead Jasmine Crockett claimed that Jeffrey Epstein donated to Lee Zeldin’s campaign when Zeldin was a New York representative.
“We gonna expose it all,” she brayed. And she sure did. She exposed herself to be an incompetent hack and typical leftist anti-Trump Democrat.
It turns out two different Jeffery Epsteins donated to Zeldin after the late sex offender committed suicide. Great research: Crockett’s staff is as ill-suited for the job as she is.
Walter Goldeski
East Brunswick, NJ
Jasmine Crockett should be forgiven for thinking that the convicted child sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein was making campaign contributions after his death: Given all the votes Democrats traditionally get from dead people, her error is entirely understandable.
Carole Campolo
East Hampton
Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.