🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth erupted over a Pentagon Force Protection Agency threat from a Musk‑aligned DOGE official, igniting chaos over power, leaks, and Pentagon control.
At a Glance
- A Musk‑aligned DOGE official threatened to deploy Pentagon police against a subordinate.
- Secretary Hegseth personally intervened and condemned the threat as excessive abuse of authority.
- No law enforcement was dispatched, but the incident intensified internal mistrust.
- Hegseth is under investigation for leaking war‑plans via unsecured Signal chats.
- DOGE’s leadership shifted toward drone modernization after the confrontation.
Cabinet Showdown Over Police Threat
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confronted Yinon Weiss from Elon Musk’s DOGE unit after Weiss allegedly threatened to summon the Pentagon Force Protection Agency to remove staffer Justin Fulcher, and Hegseth decried that move as a breach of military protocol, according to reporting by The Washington Post.
Leaks, Leadership, and the DOGE Dilemma
This confrontation follows coverage by The Daily Beast highlighting that Hegseth shared classified Yemen war‑plan details via unsecured Signal chats, prompting an Inspector General investigation and the firing of aides. In response, DOGE replaced Yinon Weiss with Owen West, pivoting the unit toward military drone development, as noted by Reuters.
Centralized Power And Institutional Strain
Analysts are raising alarms about Hegseth’s direct intervention in what initially started as a staff dispute, highlighting the potential ramifications of his involvement. This intervention, coupled with his role in leaking sensitive war plans, raises significant concerns about transparency and accountability within military operations. Furthermore, Hegseth’s close alignment with various Musk-linked initiatives suggests a troubling shift toward a more centralized authority within the Pentagon.
Such a move could undermine the institutional safeguards that have been put in place to protect against abuses of power and ensure that decisions are made through a more democratic and representative process. The implications of this trend are concerning, as they threaten to erode the checks and balances that are vital for maintaining integrity and operational effectiveness within the defense establishment.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editor
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://deepstatetribunal.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.