POLITICS: Democrats Stoke the Flames – Trump Denial Ignites Firestorm

Minnesota state flag with American flag in background

🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel


Minnesota authorities are ramping up emergency preparations as Democratic officials fuel rumors of President Trump pardoning Derek Chauvin, despite Trump’s clear denial of such plans.

Key Takeaways

  • Minnesota officials led by Democratic Gov. Tim Walz are preparing for potential civil unrest over a Derek Chauvin pardon, despite President Trump stating he “has not heard about” pardoning Chauvin
  • Attorney General Keith Ellison emphasized that Chauvin “is not getting out” as he would still need to serve his 22-and-a-half-year state sentence even if federally pardoned
  • Minnesota Department of Corrections has confirmed they are ready to transfer Chauvin from federal prison in Texas back to Minnesota if a federal pardon occurs
  • Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro has supported pardoning Chauvin, arguing the conviction was influenced by jury intimidation and political pressure
  • No credible intelligence supports rumors of an imminent pardon, suggesting Democratic officials may be stirring controversy unnecessarily

Democratic Officials Fan Pardon Speculation

Minnesota Democratic leaders are raising alarms about a possible Derek Chauvin pardon despite President Trump clearly stating he has no such plans. Gov. Tim Walz, who served as Kamala Harris’s running mate in the recent election, has taken the lead in amplifying these unsubstantiated claims, telling reporters “With this presidency, it seems like that might be something they would do,” despite Trump’s clear denial. This appears to be a calculated political move designed to agitate tensions in a state that experienced significant destruction during the 2020 George Floyd riots.

When directly questioned about pardoning the former Minneapolis police officer, President Trump clearly stated, “No, I have not heard about that.” This unambiguous denial hasn’t stopped Minnesota officials from developing contingency plans for potential civil unrest. Sources within the Department of Justice have confirmed they are unaware of any efforts to pardon Chauvin, further undermining the narrative being pushed by Democratic officials who seem determined to keep the controversy alive regardless of facts.

State Sentence Would Remain in Effect

Legal experts and state officials have repeatedly emphasized that even if President Trump were to pardon Chauvin for federal civil rights violations, it would have no impact on his state murder and manslaughter convictions. Attorney General Keith Ellison has been crystal clear on this point, stating emphatically: “He still owes Minnesota 22-and-a-half years. And, he’s going to do it either in Minnesota or somewhere, but he’s not getting out,” effectively rendering the entire controversy politically manufactured rather than legally consequential.

“If Donald Trump exercises his constitutional right to do so, whether I agree — and I strongly disagree with him — if he issues that pardon we will simply transfer Derek Chauvin to serve out his 22-and-a-half years in prison in Minnesota,” said Gov. Tim Walz.

Minnesota Department of Corrections officials have confirmed preparations to transfer Chauvin from federal custody in Texas back to Minnesota should any federal pardon materialize. This administrative process would be straightforward and merely change the location of Chauvin’s incarceration, not reduce his actual time behind bars. Community Safety Commissioner Toddrick Barnette has further stated there is no credible intelligence regarding planned disruptions, raising questions about why officials are so publicly discussing hypothetical unrest.

Conservative Support for Examining Chauvin’s Case

While Democratic officials focus on hypothetical unrest, conservative voices have raised legitimate concerns about the fairness of Chauvin’s original trial. Some MAGA supporters, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, have expressed support for revisiting the case. Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro has backed an online petition requesting a pardon, arguing that external pressures compromised the judicial process. These concerns center on whether jury intimidation and political pressure undermined Chauvin’s right to a fair trial.

“No, I haven’t even heard about it,” stated Donald Trump when asked about plans to pardon Derek Chauvin, directly contradicting the speculation being pushed by Democratic officials.

The stark contrast between factual statements from Trump administration officials and the speculative warnings from Minnesota Democrats suggests this may be more about political theater than genuine public safety concerns. Minneapolis is also anticipating a potential petition from the Department of Justice to end the consent decree over Minneapolis Police Department reforms, which the city plans to challenge – indicating broader tensions between the administration and Minnesota’s Democratic leadership extending beyond just the Chauvin case.

See also

Manufactured Crisis or Legitimate Concern?

The timing of these pardon rumors, emerging just as President Trump takes office, raises serious questions about political motivations. With no evidence that a pardon is being considered and clear denials from the administration, the aggressive preparation and public statements from Minnesota officials appear designed to keep tensions high rather than promote public safety. This approach risks unnecessarily agitating communities still healing from the destructive riots that caused over $500 million in damage to Minneapolis following Floyd’s death in 2020.

“No indication whether they’re going to do it, or not, but I think it behooves us to be prepared for it. With this presidency, it seems like something they would do,” said Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, continuing to suggest a pardon possibility despite no evidence.

For taxpayers and law-abiding citizens, the prospect of resources being allocated to prepare for civil unrest based on unfounded rumors is concerning. While preparedness is always prudent, the public statements from Democratic officials appear more focused on creating anxiety than calming tensions. As this situation develops, conservatives will continue monitoring whether this represents responsible governance or political theater at the expense of community stability and taxpayer resources.





Source link

Join us on Telegram
Exit mobile version