KNOWLEDGE is POWER / REAL NEWS is KEY
New York: Friday, December 12, 2025
© 2025 U-S-NEWS.COM
Online Readers: 333 (random number)
New York: Friday, December 12, 2025
Online: 344 (random number)
Join our "Free Speech Social Platform ONGO247.COM" Click Here
Politics: candace owens' toxic charlie kirk slanders are poisoning the

POLITICS: Candace Owens’ toxic Charlie Kirk slanders are poisoning the right

🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel


Few would have guessed that Erika Kirk would have to spend energy these last few, heartbreaking months fending off a right-wing influencer bent on implicating her slain husband’s own organization, Turning Point USA, in his assassination. 

Here we are, though.

Influential voices on the right have become more and more conspiratorial in recent years — and now, the paranoia is being wielded against its own. 

In the aftermath of the Kirk assassination, the talk was of an energized MAGA movement picking up his baton. 

Instead, TPUSA has been slandered nearly every single day by one of the loudest right-wing voices on the internet for allegedly carrying out a murderous coup against its own leader.

Podcaster Candace Owens, a former TPUSA employee and friend of Charlie Kirk, has been the primary author of this libel. 

She’s taken an open-and-shut murder case and turned it into a whodunit.

In episode after episode, she invests enormous significance in minutiae, asks for help from listeners in tracking down supposedly crucial information, attacks anyone who pushes back against her accusations, and suggests that she could be killed at any time by the same shadowy forces that took out Kirk.

And it all comes back to TPUSA, whose leaders were allegedly in on the crime in order to elevate themselves once Charlie Kirk was out of the way. 

This is fantastical, vile stuff — but no one can say, “Oh, we’re so disappointed in Candace. What happened to her?”

She believes the moon landing was a fabrication (Stanley Kubrick filmed the whole thing) and dinosaurs are “fake and gay.”

The Jews have a special place in her conspiracies.

Harvard is a Mossad base. Israel was involved in the 9/11 attacks.

The Holocaust is exaggerated or fake, and Elie Wiesel is a liar.

The Jews carried out the Bolshevik Revolution in order to exterminate Christians.



The Jews killed JFK and, for some reason, also Michael Jackson.

Tucker Carlson, Owens’ friend and ally, is adopting a judicious, wait-and-see attitude about whether TPUSA killed its own leader or not.

But he, too, is a fount of conspiracies, most recently promoting the idea that the government is seeding the sky with toxic “chemtrails.”

Whereas once conspiratorial thinking was a guarantee of marginality, now it is no bar to obtaining a huge audience. It may even help.

Outlandish theories generate passion and interest, and are rewarded by social-media algorithms. 

It can all be very profitable, making it difficult to distinguish between genuine irrationality and rank moneymaking. 

A Candace Owens lacks conventional influence; officeholders aren’t seeking her favor or asking for her advice.

But she has single-handedly defined the debate in the aftermath of Kirk’s death in a way few other media figures could. 



It’s a symptom of the state of the influencer ecosystem that many of the MAGA figures now — thankfully — denouncing Owens for her crackpot Charlie Kirk theories have plenty of crackpot theories of their own.

It was telling that when Carlson interviewed white nationalist Nick Fuentes, each confessed that he thought the other was a “fed,” or working undercover for federal law enforcement.

Now, of course, we should expect anything the government or any other official body tells us to be backed up by reliable evidence.

And sometimes conspiracies are real: There were indeed attempted cover-ups of the likelihood that COVID emanated from a Chinese lab, and of the senescence of President Joe Biden. 

There’s a difference, though, between a healthy skepticism and runaway paranoia; the former requires a careful adherence to facts, the latter dispenses with them.

The Candace Owens take on the Kirk assassination is supposed to be hardheaded in rejecting the official “narrative.”

In actuality, it depends on the credulousness of her listeners, who are asked to buy into a fanciful counter-narrative that depends entirely on one cynical podcaster’s say-so. 

In this regard, maybe her audience isn’t conspiratorial-minded enough — and the psyops are so subtle and far-reaching that even Candace Owens isn’t on the up-and-up. 

 X: @RichLowry



Source link



OnGo247
New 100% Free
Social Platform
ONGO247.COM
Give it a spin!
Sign Up Today
OnGo247
New 100% Free
Social Platform
ONGO247.COM
Give it a spin!
Sign Up Today