POLITICS: Bill Gates Advocated For AI To Limit Freedom Of Speech (Video) – USSA News

Freedom of speech is a God-given unalienable right that the government, its cronies, the wealthy, the corporations, the non-governmental organizations (NGOs), international NGOs, and public-private partnerships want to control. These entities seek to control the freedom of speech of individuals by using fallacious arguments such as “incitement of violence”. One such proponent of controlling speech regarding “vaccines” is Bill Gates. Gates proposes the general public should be censored using artificial intelligence (AI) if the official narrative on “vaccines” is questioned.

Billionaire Bill Gates is calling for members of the general public to be censored by artificial intelligence (AI) if they question the official narratives regarding “vaccines.”

Gates, the Jeffrey Epstein-linked co-founder of Microsoft, made the call during a recent interview with CNBC.

He was discussing the “threat” of “anti-vaxxers” and promoting plans for handling “vaccine hesitancy” using “real-time” censorship imposed by AI.

Gates argues that those who urge people to avoid vaccines are “inciting violence.”

Therefore, he insists that “anti-vaxxers” are a “threat” to public health.

In response, Gates proposes a totalitarian approach, calling for speech “boundaries.”

He claims that AI-powered computer systems can weed out and eliminate “vaccine misinformation” in real-time.

How does “urging people to avoid vaccines” incite violence? How are those questioning the “official narrative on vaccines” threatening public health?

Mandating individuals receive a medical intervention, denying an individual the right to deny a medical intervention, is actually inciting violence. And, failing to disclose all information surrounding the development, production, research, clinical trial data, and contents of “vaccines” threatens public health. Those who provide solid information using the government’s own websites and documents are informing the people of that which the government, the pharmaceutical companies, and the medical-industrial complex have failed to do despite their claims otherwise.

In essence, what Bill Gates desires to do is eradicate any speech that would encourage individuals to exercise proper informed consent. Gates is motivated by greed. He has invested quite a lot of money into the vaccine machine. In fact, Gates has bragged about the 20 to 1 return on his investment of $10 billion dollars. Gates is an advocate for mass vaccination of the public, whether with the “traditional antigen based” vaccines to the experimental mRNA gene therapy shots that include more than CONvid-1984 injections. He wants all “vaccines” to be mRNA gene therapy shots.

Now the prominent philanthropist wants to use artificial intelligence (AI) for real-time censorship of vaccine-related “misinformation.”

Conveniently, much of the so-called “misinformation” he wants to target is related to information that counters his plans.

His comments during the recent CNBC interview have sparked a heated debate about free speech rights, mind control, and the rewriting of history by the elite.

Gates, who is deeply and psychotically invested in vaccines through the Gates Foundation, GAVI, and the World Health Organization (WHO), has increasingly focused on combating vaccine “misinformation.”

However, this form of censorship is really just the suppression of vaccine injury testimonials and the abolition of informed consent.

In his latest interview, he expressed a desire to impose “boundaries” on speech, particularly relating to vaccines.

Gates argued that free speech incites violence or deters individuals from getting vaccinated.

“We should have free speech, but if you’re inciting violence or causing people not to take vaccines, where are those boundaries?” Gates said.

He suggested that America might need new rules to address these issues.

He noted that AI-driven systems could swiftly identify and suppress “harmful content” before it has a chance to spread.

Remember, Gates is not proposing boundaries upon himself, which means he would need to be truthful. Gates is proposing boundaries on free speech to those who research and provide the truth, which has been in stark contrast to the pack of lies, misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda peddled by Gates and government. Gates means to suppress truth, even if that information is coming from the government’s own documents.

Let’s use Hepatitis B Vaccine – Recombinant (Recombivax HB) as an example. The hyperlink routes you to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website’s package insert. Hepatitis B injection is given to all infants on the day of birth. This “vaccine” was not properly tested using a placebo control group, an adequate number of trial participants, or a proper follow-up timeframe to determine the safety of the vaccine. How do we know that? In Section 6.1, the package insert on the FDA website indicates there were only 147 participants aged 0 to 10 years who received 434 doses (average 3 for each participant) and were followed up for only five days after each dose. No mention of a placebo group. Is five days long enough to determine safety or any serious adverse events? No, and that is according to Stanley Plotkin, who admitted it in a deposition conducted by Informed Consent Action Network attorney Aaron Siri. Any individual with brain capacity can say five days is not enough time to discover some serious adverse events. Moreover, there is no indication how many infants 0 to 1 were among the 147 participants.

Would this be speech that Gates would want to put boundaries around?

In the same package insert under Section 6.2, there is a list of adverse events that were reported post-marketing – after the vaccine was released for public use. Adverse events listed include autoimmune disease such as lupus erythematosus, Guillian Barre syndrome, multiple sclerosis, transverse myelitis, Bell’s palsy, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, seizures, and a host of others. Hypersensitivity reactions include anaphylaxis. So, if someone said it is possible this particular vaccine caused these issues, would that be speech Gates would want AI to censor? Absolutely.

Section 6.2 contains this little caveat regarding adverse events reported; “Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to a vaccine exposure.” In other words, there is no system currently in place to follow vaccine recipients to know any frequency of any adverse events or to establish a causal relationship to a vaccine. Would it not be prudent to know if a “new” product was causing harm? This one package insert basically declared the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to be inadequate.

In Section 8.4 of the package insert, it is stated, “Safety and effectiveness of RECOMBIVAX HB have been established in all pediatric age groups”. However, this package insert states that pediatric ages 0 to 10 were only followed for five days for adverse events (safety). What about effectiveness? Section 5.5 of the package insert states, “Additionally, vaccination with RECOMBIVAX HB may not protect all individuals.” Who are the individuals this vaccine would not protect against Hepatitis B? That information is not available meaning it probably was not researched. So, if someone said that this vaccine is not effective in all individuals, would Gates want that information censored. You betcha!

This is all information readily available to the public from the FDA’s website. This is part of the information that doctors should be giving their patients when obtaining informed consent. Did anyone get this information from their doctor on any Hepatitis B vaccine? One could guess the answer would be no. Bill Gates would have anyone who provides this information online, outside the government website, censored.

How many children have to die or be injured before the issue of vaccine safety and effectiveness are openly debated? Remember the government’s motto when it comes to “gun control”, which is really gun confiscation – “if it saves one child, ….” In regards to vaccines, shouldn’t the motto be, “if it injures or kills one child, we should stop doing it?” Parents justify vaccinating children to prevent a miniscule number of deaths from disease, but never balance that out to the number of children injured or dead because of vaccinations.

During the CONvid-1984 planned scam-demic censorship ramped up to unprecedented levels. It hasn’t abated. Now, Gates wants more restrictions imposed. What Gates wants, Gates gets. An AI program will be used by social media platforms to censor speech that reveals the truth about vaccines under the guise of “misinformation”, “inciting violence”, and promoting “vaccine hesitancy”. Should this come to pass, the only avenue left to get the information out would be email lists and printed pamphlets. But, Gates would probably make sure email platforms run the AI as well on email sent and received. Unfortunately, it won’t stop at social media platforms. It will target websites dedicated to exposing the dangers of vaccinations created by pharmaceutical companies that have immunity from liability from anyone injured or killed by their sorcery.

Those researching issues surrounding vaccinations to bring the truth to the people get no money if anyone takes a vaccine nor get any money if anyone chooses not to take a vaccine. Can Gates say the same? Can those at the FDA, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), your doctor, other government agency, or health department say the same? Researchers on vaccines are advocates for proper informed consent and advocates for medical choice. Gates and company are for denying informed consent and imposition of mandates all for money. They care not about truth, only their wallets, which is why those who provide truthful information have to be silenced by censorship and “speech boundaries”.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

The post Bill Gates Advocated For AI To Limit Freedom Of Speech (Video) appeared first on The Washington Standard.