KNOWLEDGE is POWER / REAL NEWS is KEY
New York: Sunday, November 03, 2024
ยฉ 2024 U-S-NEWS.COM
Online Readers: 305 (random number)
New York: Sunday, November 03, 2024
Online: 338 (random number)
Join our "Free Speech Social Platform ONGO247.COM" Click Here
Politics: Biden's Forced End To Port Strike Is A Bad

POLITICS: Biden’s forced end to port strike is a bad deal for us all

๐Ÿ”ด Website ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.me/usnewscom_channel


So President Bidenโ€™s top aides swooped in with their renowned mediation skills, and saved the average American from a Christmas season of empty shelves and (even) higher prices stemming from a long dockworkersโ€™ strike.

Thatโ€™s the narrative the White House is peddling about its role in ending the three-day walkout.

Not so fast: Biden strong-armed the ports into a bad deal that in the long run will push up prices โ€” andย harmย organized labor.

Last Tuesday, the 50,000-strong International Longshoremenโ€™s Association (shouldnโ€™t we call them longshorepeople?) struck against East Coast ports, including Port Authority of New York and New Jersey facilities, logjamming container shipments.

The ILA wanted a 77% raise over six years, and a freeze to automation of tasks. The ports, under the US Maritime Alliance,ย had proposed aย 50% wage increase, and want more flexibility on automation.

So the deal Biden achieved last week โ€” 62% raises โ€” is a nice compromise, right?

No: Biden achieved the deal through coercion โ€” coercion his administration is proud of.

On the strikeโ€™s third morning, The Washington Post reported, Bidenโ€™s Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, with the support of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Labor Secretary Julie Su,ย ended a callย with port employers by telling them โ€œhe was going to tell Biden in about an hour that they had agreed to propose a new offer to the unionโ€ฆ[T]he shipping executives had agreed to do no such thing.โ€

This was a barely veiled threat:ย Iโ€™m telling the president you already did this, so you better do it.

Unsurprisingly, the wage offer that the ports made under this duress is generous.

Yes, itโ€™s reasonable for dockworkers to expect employers to make up for years of Biden-era inflation.

But this deal does more than that.

In 2018,ย before theย lastย contract, a dockworker made $35 an hour. Today the hourly pay is $39; to keep up with inflation,ย it would need to be $44.

Assuming inflation remains around 2% annually โ€” isnโ€™t Kamala Harrisย sayingย that Biden beat inflation? โ€” this $44 wage would be $50 by 2030.

Instead, dockworker pay will spike to $63 an hour. (Thanks to overtime and bonuses for working irregular schedules,ย more than halfย of New York-area dockworkers earn more than $150,000 a year.)

Port operators might agree to an above-inflation deal in return for concessions: Particularly, a union giveback on automation so that our ports operateย more efficiently, like Europeโ€™s do.

Maybe the operators and union would agree to automation that doesnโ€™t involve job losses for anyone already employed โ€” lowering port costs, and consumer prices, in the long run.

But the deal that Biden forced the operators to make leaves all that to be negotiated over the next few months.

With the dockworkers already having secured theย goodย part of the deal โ€” the $63 base pay โ€” what gives them an incentive to offer anything in return?

Biden could have stopped the strike, and created an environment for fairer negotiations, by using the tool Congress gave him: the Taft-Hartley Act, which allows him to suspend a strike for 60 days if that strikeย will affectย the nationโ€™s health or safety.

Taft-Hartley, passed in 1947, is not anti-union.

Congress wisely determined in that era of increasingly powerful private-sector unions that if Americans were to maintain support for organized labor, unions couldnโ€™t take the public hostage by refusing to perform critical tasks.

Biden insists heโ€™s pro-union, but heโ€™s eroding a law thatย protects unions against themselves โ€” and protects union members from irresponsible union leaders.

The Biden administration thinks it will get political credit not just for averting new supply-chain disruptions, but for being pro-worker.

โ€œBy bluntly and unmistakably declaring he would not seek an injunction under Taft-Hartley, the president created space for collective bargaining,โ€ Seth Harris, a former Biden adviser, told Theย Washington Post.

Itโ€™s the opposite: Both sides knew that Taft-Hartley is the law, and is thus the framework under which bargaining should occur.

Bidenย circumventedย bargaining by making it clear which side he was on, and disregarding the law to help that side.

But favoring the ILA โ€” with its history ofย Mafiaย ties and no-show and sweetheart jobs โ€” is hardly a good example of enlightened worker advocacy.

The unchecked power of unions like the ILA isย whyย people stopped liking unions around the 1970s.

Most people arenโ€™t longshoremen, and they know they canโ€™t take the economy hostage to ask for a raise.

They just want a fairer deal for everyone, no extortion necessary. ย 

Nicole Gelinas is a contributing editor to the Manhattan Instituteโ€™s City Journal.



Source link

OnGo247
New 100% Free
Social Platform
ONGO247.COM
Give it a spin!
Sign Up Today
OnGo247
New 100% Free
Social Platform
ONGO247.COM
Give it a spin!
Sign Up Today