KNOWLEDGE is POWER / REAL NEWS is KEY
New York: Wednesday, September 10, 2025
© 2025 U-S-NEWS.COM
Online Readers: 329 (random number)
New York: Wednesday, September 10, 2025
Online: 336 (random number)
Join our "Free Speech Social Platform ONGO247.COM" Click Here
“That man was hurting” * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Noah

NEWS HEADLINES: “That man was hurting” * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Noah

🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel

Holy crap this is bad!

Van Jones has had some terrible takes over the years, but this one might be his all time worst.

After a deranged black man stabbed a defenseless 23-year-old white woman for no reason, killing her almost instantly, what is Van Jones’ take on the whole thing?

He offers sympathy for the demonic attacker, saying and I quote: “That man was hurting.  Hurt people hurt people.”

Oh ok Van Jones!  Yes, the focus right now should be on how that man was hurting, and not on the vicious way in which he stabbed that poor girl’s throat making her bleed out in the seat!

YOU VILE HUMAN BEING!

Watch here:

TRANSCRIPT:

We don’t know why that man did what he did.

We don’t know how to deal with people who are hurting in the way this man was hurting.

Hurt people hurt people.

What happened was horrible.

No one mentioned the word race, white, Black, or anything except him.

And since that is a short clip, here is the longer clip in context.

SPOILER ALERT: it’s even worse in the longer clip.

The CNN panel talks about how we know these people are sick in the head, but we can’t FORCE them to seek help!  We can’t take away their liberty!

Oh yes we can you dummies!  It’s called Insane Asylums!  LOCK THEM UP!  It’s called involuntary commitment.

You’re worried about this animal’s liberty?

I’m not!

I’m worried about the dead 23-year-old woman!

Then instead of talking about the victim or the fact that this is clearly a hate crime and would be 24/7 news until the end of time if roles were reversed, the somehow find a way to make it all about George Floyd again!

Absolutely unreal.

The capstone then is Van Jones ending the segment by saying how bad he feels for the attacker because “the man was hurting”.

You know what I think about this entire panel?

TUNE OUT NOW IF YOU DON’T LIKE BAD LANGUAGE, but after watching this whole segment all I can say to everyone on this panel is go fuck yourselves!  Seriously, fuck each and every one of you on this panel.  You are gross, disgusting excuses for human beings.  This might be the worst 3 minutes of television I have ever seen.  Truly sick.

Watch here:

TRANSCRIPT:

Voters, once they called attention to it. So certain people have been, um, looking for an opportunity to find a case like this, to make a point like this.

I wanna play—this is Charlie Kirk, why he says this hasn’t gotten a lot of attention. A white Ukrainian refugee was murdered just because she was white.

Everybody knows that, obviously. If a random white person simply walked up to and stabbed a nice, law-abiding Black person for no reason, it would be an apocalyptically huge national story used to impose national sweeping political change on the whole country.

Instead, Megan Basham, no one seems to care when a white woman gets stabbed to death.

He said white a lot. Well, we are talking about it here. So I guess—true. I mean, I don’t think that’s fair. Look, being in the system, because I have represented people who are mentally ill, and here’s the balance.

The balance is taking away people’s freedom versus evaluating their mental illness. In New York City there are a lot of programs for people who are mentally ill, but they have to want to be there.

Yeah, and it’s super difficult because it’s about forcing them to be there. When you are mentally ill, you have a hard time knowing that you are mentally ill.

But also, I mean, people like Charlie Kirk, Van, they’ve been looking for opportunities to make this some sort of like reciprocal George Floyd situation, and that’s the part that I think he’s almost giving away the game, and it’s sad to see a lot of people going along with it.

You know, let me just say a couple things. One is, what happened to that young woman was horrible, and it’s everybody’s nightmare if you’re in any public space—subway, whatever—that something bad’s gonna happen to you or somebody you care about. So it does strike a chord.

We don’t know why that man did what he did, and for Charlie Kirk to say, “We know he did it because she’s white,” when there’s no evidence of that, is just pure race—uh, race mongering, hate mongering. It’s wrong.

Then he says that if something like that had happened the other way, there would be sweeping changes imposed on society. Where is the George Floyd Policing Act? It didn’t pass.

Even when you had a white police officer murder a Black man on live television—the whole world saw—there were no sweeping changes. In fact, not one law was passed at the federal level. So that’s, that’s, I think that’s an important thing to point out.

The other thing is, you mentioned the thing about cashless bail. I think this is a big challenge that we have. Would you have felt better if there had been cash bail and the mom had come and put down $1000 to let him out?

It’s not about cashless bail or no cashless bail. It’s about the fact that we don’t know how to deal with people who are hurting in the way this man was hurting. Hurt people hurt people.

What happened was horrible, but it becomes an opportunity for people to jump on bandwagons. And then for someone like Charlie Kirk, he should be ashamed of himself.

No one mentioned the word race, white, Black, or anything except him. What people mentioned is the horror of what happened to this young woman.

Backup here if needed:

And if defending the demonic neck-stabber is not his worst take ever, then this racist rant probably is.

Remember this?

Here is Van Jones saying, and I quote: “All white people have a virus in their brain that can activate in an instant”.

Watch here:

This Van Jones guy is sick.

Truly disgusting.

I can’t stand racists!

Speaking of, how about this story?

Can you even imagine the outrage if I said: “I went to a WNBA game in Atlanta and I was the only white man in the stands and it really triggered me.”

You would never hear the end of it!  And for good reason, it would be a really stupid-ass thing to say.

So how is this ok?

My Boyfriend Is A Tennis Star — And Being The Only Black Woman In The Stands TRIGGERED Me

I questioned whether I wanted to give this lady any attention and maybe I shouldn’t have, but I just couldn’t resist.

This has got to be one of the most classic Far-Left, Woke, Victim-mentality quotes of all time.

Here is the direct headline from Yahoo News:

More here:

And here’s a portion of the Yahoo News article for context — if you can stomach it:

Ayan Broomfield is more than a WAG (a wife/girlfriend of an athlete). Yes, she’s the longtime girlfriend of American tennis star Frances Tiafoe, who she first started dating in 2015. But she’s also a former NCAA tennis player in her own right and someone who has taken her transition to the stands seriously.

Traveling to Tiafoe’s tournaments across the globe opened Broomfield’s eyes to a lack of diversity in the tennis community. At the 2025 Australian Open, she noticed that it was difficult to find other women of color in the crowd. She made a TikTok pointing out the issue and then decided to do something about it.

That “something” is Ayan’s Aces, Broomfield’s initiative focused on bringing diversity to tennis. In March, she hosted a suite at the Miami Open for a group of Black female creators. At this year’s U.S. Open, she hosted two more, doing her part to make the stands feel a little more inclusive.

Speaking to Yahoo’s Kerry Justich, Broomfield shares in her own words why representation on and off the tennis court matters — and how being a modern-day WAG has provided her with a chance to make a difference in the sport.

I played junior tennis in Canada, so I did the whole junior Canadian tennis tour, and I never really saw [a lack of diversity] as this apparent issue. It was really when I started traveling with Frances a lot more. There’s a huge discrepancy between women of color on the court and women of color off the court, in the stands. Earlier this year, at the Australian Open, was when I really, really felt like this was an issue. I went on social and made a little TikTok about it. I wasn’t expecting anything from it, but it actually created such an amazing community that had such amazing feedback from so many women who were interested in it. I realized that there was a hole here that needed to be filled and that I have the ability to help fix it and try my best to put more women of color into seats at tennis tournaments. It’s an incredible sport, and everyone should have the ability to access it.

Representation off the court

Representation matters on both ends. For the fans and people coming to the tournament, being able to walk into the stadium and see people who look like you makes you feel comfortable. It makes you feel like you belong and that you’re seen. There are also plenty of women of color competing at the highest levels on court. You have Naomi [Osaka], you have Coco Gauff, and I’m sure for them as well, being able to look up in the stands and see other women of color cheering for them and being a support system for them is probably incredible. Players have to deal with so many stresses on the court, so having that community of women to look up to in the stands or just around the site or stadium is probably an incredible feeling.

We’re building a really, really amazing community of women. Hearing everyone’s stories about how they got into tennis or why they wanted to come to the tennis tournament, it’s really heartwarming. It’s something that I’m really proud of, and I just hope that we can continue to work with these tournaments and work with these brands.

Ok, now my thoughts…

What utter nonsense!

This woman is dating a Tennis star, attending the events, living the high life, clearly based on the photos in the article and on her YouTube channel living a very elegant and expensive lifestyle, but she’s TRIGGERED by being the “only black woman in the stands”.

First of all, I doubt that’s even true.

Just more liberal exaggeration and whining.

Second, how these people (and by “these people” I clearly mean triggered liberals) — how these people can even get through a day being TRIGGERED by seemingly everything in life is stunning to me:

I mean, it must really be awful living in that kind of headspace.

Third, why is EVERYTHING constantly about race with these people?

And by “these people” I mean, well, see above.

I prefer to live in a world spoken about by a Reverend who once said this:

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

That’s the world I live in.

Judge people by the content of their character, not by their skin color.

But with these people, all they can see is skin color!

To quote and paraphrase another famous person, Mr. Haley Joel Osment:

“I see white people everywhere!”

Spoiler alert: he’s been dead the whole movie.  I hope I didn’t ruin it for you, but it’s been 26 years.

MEMO TO AYAN BROOMFIELD:  I guess white people like tennis.  You like tennis.  You’re all there together.  What’s the problem?

And can I ask a question?

If you do have a problem with that, does that make YOU the racist?

Are white people not allowed to watch tennis?

How incredibly stupid!

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

View the original article here.





Source link