🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court just handed President Trump his biggest win yet — a true game-changer for his Second Term (and for this Nation).
Writing for the Court, Amy Coney Barrett said that universal nationwide injunctions issued by rogue judges are Unconstitutional and illegal:
A huge rulling by the Supreme Court, smacking down the ridiculous process of nationwide injunctions. Under our system, everyone has to follow the law–including judges! pic.twitter.com/S3Os7RpV6F
— JD Vance (@JDVance) June 27, 2025
I do have to disagree with my President on one point…calling this a GIANT WIN doesn’t even go far enough. This is truly game-changing to the rest of his Presidency!!!
This greatly speeds up and frees up President Trump to now implement his agenda on every issue.
The days of some random Obama/Soros District Court judge from Timbuktu issuing a ruling that stops President Trump are OVER!
BREAKING: The Supreme Court just put the brakes on activist judges blocking national policy with “universal injunctions.”
In a 6–3 ruling written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, SCOTUS said federal courts are overstepping when they issue nationwide rulings for people who aren’t… pic.twitter.com/oFGGfmNKyr
— Hank
BREAKING: The Supreme Court just put the brakes on activist judges blocking national policy with “universal injunctions.”
(@HANKonX) Here’s a quick summary of all the key details:
Big Win for Trump Administration: The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that lower federal courts likely exceeded their constitutional authority by issuing nationwide injunctions — a major victory for President Trump and his executive powers.
Limiting Judicial Overreach: Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the conservative majority, said federal courts are meant to settle individual disputes, not oversee the entire Executive Branch or block federal policies wholesale.
Impact on Trump’s Executive Order: The case originated from President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens on short-term visas or without legal status. Lower courts had blocked the order nationwide — the Supreme Court said that went too far.
Nationwide Injunctions Not Historically Grounded: The Court ruled that such broad injunctions were not contemplated in the Judiciary Act of 1789 and lack any historical basis.
Injunctions Must Be Narrow: Courts may only grant relief to the actual plaintiffs in a lawsuit, unless the case is formally certified as a class action — tightening the scope of judicial remedies against federal policy.
Constitutionality of Trump’s Order Undecided: Importantly, the Court did not rule on whether Trump’s birthright citizenship order is constitutional. The ruling was strictly about judicial authority and the proper scope of injunctions.
Liberal Justices Dissent Strongly: Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented. Jackson warned the ruling lets the government violate constitutional rights until every affected individual sues.
Justice Barrett Rebukes Dissent: In a rare move, Barrett directly criticized Justice Jackson’s dissent, accusing her of wanting an “imperial Judiciary” while criticizing an “imperial Executive.”
Ruling Leaves Some Doors Open: The Court left open the possibility that state governments may still be able to obtain broader relief — allowing for case-by-case discretion on whether a nationwide remedy is needed.
Future Implications: This decision will limit the growing trend of single federal judges halting presidential actions nationwide, forcing challenges to be more targeted and possibly slower.
Attorney General Praises Ruling: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi applauded the ruling, saying it ends “endless” judicial blockades of Trump’s policies and affirms the President’s authority to act.
Here was the best part:
Here’s more live from Fox News:
BREAKING: SCOTUS just ruled that the nationwide injunctions by activist judges likely exceed their authority
MASSIVE WIN
This should help put a stop to the judicial activism trying to halt Trump’s agenda pic.twitter.com/qFkdxsL4uk
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 27, 2025
While not directly the issue of the case, this also opens the door for President Trump to end birthright citizenship.
At the very least, it puts his Executive Order doing so back on the table for now, with the lower court injunction now ruled as illegal and Unconstitutional:
JUST IN:
— Remarks (@remarks) June 27, 2025
President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship officially in effect.That doesn’t mean this issue isn’t still on the table and will almost certainly eventually be appealed to the Supreme Court to be ruled on directly, but for now it removes the lower court injunction that had stopped the Executive Order.
Who else is doing their happy dance right now with me?
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.