NEWS HEADLINES: Mom Ignored Them All – Then She Armed Her Son

Handcuffed person talking with officer at desk

🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel


A Texas mother faces terrorism charges after providing her 13-year-old son with ammunition and tactical gear for a planned school attack, ignoring repeated warnings from authorities about his violent behavior and white supremacist ideology.

Key Takeaways

  • Ashley Pardo, 33, was charged with aiding in terrorism after allegedly purchasing ammunition and tactical gear for her son who planned violence at Rhodes Middle School.
  • The 13-year-old appeared at school wearing tactical gear but left without executing his plan and was later charged with terrorism.
  • Authorities discovered the teen possessed an improvised explosive device with white supremacist symbols and references to mass shootings.
  • Despite previous warnings from law enforcement and school officials about her son’s concerning behavior, Pardo allegedly dismissed these concerns.
  • The case represents one of the first applications of Texas’ new terrorism registry law and follows a growing trend of holding parents accountable for children’s potential violent acts.

Mother Charged Under New Texas Terrorism Law

Ashley Pardo, 33, faces serious charges for allegedly supplying her son with the tools he intended to use in a mass violence attack at Jeremiah Rhodes Middle School in San Antonio. According to court records, Pardo purchased ammunition and tactical gear for her teenage son “with knowledge” that these items would be “used to plan and carry out” violent acts. The 13-year-old boy arrived at school wearing tactical gear but left campus without carrying out his plan. Both mother and son now face terrorism charges under a recently enacted Texas law.

Police reports indicate that Pardo had been repeatedly warned about her son’s disturbing behavior by both school officials and law enforcement. The teenager had reportedly created violent drawings, researched mass shootings, and displayed concerning behavior that prompted multiple interventions. Despite these red flags, authorities allege that Pardo not only dismissed these concerns but actively facilitated her son’s interests by purchasing tactical gear and ammunition as payment for babysitting services.

Disturbing Evidence Discovered

The case came to authorities’ attention when the boy’s grandmother contacted police after finding him hitting a live bullet with a hammer. A subsequent investigation revealed the teenager had accumulated disturbing materials. Family members discovered ammunition, tactical gear, and an improvised explosive device in the student’s possession. The device reportedly contained references to the Christchurch shooter and displayed white supremacist symbols. Investigators also found Nazi swastikas and other concerning items in Pardo’s home.

“She appeared to be dismissive and unconcerned with her son’s behavior. Her behavior is not only dangerous, it’s abhorrent, especially as a parent.” San Antonio police Chief William P. McManus.

See also

Child Protective Services had previously documented concerns about the family situation, according to court records. Following the incident, the school implemented increased security measures and conducted a full sweep for potential threats. School principal Felismina Martinez communicated with parents about the situation, reassuring them about the school’s commitment to safety. Pardo has been released on a $75,000 bond and is scheduled for a pre-indictment hearing on July 17.

New Legal Precedent for Parental Responsibility

This case represents a significant legal development as it involves a parent being charged in connection with a planned attack that was never executed. Pardo faces charges under a new Texas law authored by Republican state Senator Phil King that created a specific terrorism charge and established a state registry for such crimes. The law was designed to help law enforcement better identify and address potential threats before they materialize into actual violence.

“What we’ve had in place so far clearly has not worked. We have to do something else because the consequences are so tragic and so dire.” said Michael Wynne, criminal defense attorney.

Legal experts draw parallels to the Michigan case where parents Jennifer and James Crumbley were sentenced to 10-year prison terms for involuntary manslaughter after their son carried out a deadly school shooting. The Pardo case, however, is distinctive because it involves charges related to a planned attack that was prevented rather than one that was carried out. This represents an evolving legal approach where parents may face serious consequences for failing to intervene when their children exhibit warning signs of potential violence, especially when they actively facilitate access to dangerous materials.





Source link

Join us on Telegram
Exit mobile version