KNOWLEDGE is POWER / REAL NEWS is KEY
New York: Saturday, July 12, 2025
ยฉ 2025 U-S-NEWS.COM
Online Readers: 335 (random number)
New York: Saturday, July 12, 2025
Online: 306 (random number)
Join our "Free Speech Social Platform ONGO247.COM" Click Here
Justice Department Claims Democrat-Led State Is Contributing To Increased Egg Prices In Lawsuit * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Danielle

NEWS HEADLINES: Justice Department Claims Democrat-Led State Is Contributing To Increased Egg Prices In Lawsuit * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Danielle

๐Ÿ”ด Website ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.me/usnewscom_channel

The Trump administration filed a lawsuit against California, claiming the stateโ€™s laws and regulations are contributing to higher egg prices.

The Justice Department alleged Gov. Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and other state officials of violating the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

In its complaint, the Justice Department alleges that โ€œunnecessary red tapeโ€ is increasing egg prices nationwide.

โ€œCalifornia has effectively prevented farmers across the country from using a number of agricultural production methods which were in widespread use and which helped keep eggs affordable,โ€ the Justice Department said in the complaint, according toย CBS News.

More from CBS News:

Two California ballot initiatives, passed in 2008 and 2018, mandate higher standards and housing requirements for hen-laying chickens and eggs sold in the state, requiring the birds to be given enough space to extend their limbs and move without touching another bird.

The 2018 ballot initiative also bars hens from being kept in any โ€œenclosure other than a cage-free housing systemโ€ and mandates space requirements for breeding pigs and calves raised for veal.

Those laws, the Trump administration alleges, are preempted by the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution and the Egg Products Inspection Act, which was passed in 1970. The Trump administration also cites data that showed in the years after the first major restriction was passed, egg production in the state decreased and egg prices increased by 20%.

Californiaโ€™s requirements, the Justice Department says, โ€œwere driven by activistsโ€™ conception of what qualifies as โ€˜cruelโ€™ animal housing, not by consumer purchasing decisions or scientifically based food safety or animal welfare standards.โ€

Supporters of Californiaโ€™s laws, like the Humane Society of the United States, argue they protect farm animals from being โ€œlocked in cruel and extreme confinement.โ€ In many cases, egg-laying hens are confined to tiny cages.

The complaint also alleges that โ€œCaliforniaโ€™s egg standards do not advance consumer welfare.โ€

โ€œWith respect to Californiaโ€™s most recent voter initiative imposing new standards of egg quality, Proposition 12, the California Department of Food and Agriculture has stated in its regulatory analysis that despite the initiativeโ€™s purported concern for consumer โ€˜health and safety,โ€™ the egg standards โ€˜are not based in specific peer-reviewed published scientific literature or accepted as standards within the scientific community to reduce human food-borne illness,โ€ the complaint read, according toย Fox Business.

Fox Business noted:

Additional regulations included providing a minimum of one square foot of usable floor space per hen for multi-tiered and partially slatted systems, and a minimum of 1.5 square feet of usable floor space per hen in single-level floor systems.

The regulations also define a โ€œcage-free housing systemโ€ as โ€œan indoor or outdoor controlled environment for egg-laying hens within which hens are free to roam unrestricted; are provided enrichments that allow them to exhibit natural behaviors, including, at a minimum, scratch areas, perches, nest boxes, and dust bathing areas; and within which farm employees can provide care while standing within the hensโ€™ useable floorspace.โ€

Sales of eggs in California that do not comply with California regulations are considered criminal offenses that carry a penalty of up to a $1,000 fine and 180 days in jail. Violations are also considered โ€œunfair competition,โ€ which could result in civil action for damages.

โ€œBureaucratic red tape and unnecessary regulations implemented by the State of California have made the cost of everyday goods, like eggs, less affordable for Americans,โ€ U.S. Civil Division Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate said. โ€œThis Department of Justice will work to free consumers from this regulatory burden and bring economic prosperity to families.โ€





Source link