🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
Trump’s blunt warning to Iran’s ayatollah — “we will start shooting if you do” — marks a rare moment when an American leader draws a clear, hard line against a brutal regime targeting its own people.
Story Highlights
- Nationwide Iranian protests have become one of the toughest challenges to the Islamic Republic in years, with open calls to end clerical rule.
- Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s regime is jailing protesters, threatening death sentences, and choking off the internet to hide the crackdown.
- Trump has told Iran’s leaders that if they start shooting protesters, the United States will hit back “very, very hard where it hurts.”
- Exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi is urging Iranians to seize city centers and positioning himself as an alternative to the regime.
Trump’s Direct Warning Meets Iran’s Most Defiant Protests in Years
Nationwide demonstrations in Iran, sparked by inflation, unemployment, and crushing living costs, have rapidly turned into one of the most serious challenges the Islamic Republic has faced since 1979. Crowds in multiple cities are no longer just demanding cheaper food or fuel; they are chanting for an end to clerical rule and openly calling out Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by name. For many conservative Americans, this unrest highlights how ordinary Iranians are rebelling against the same kind of authoritarian, top‑down control we fight against in softer form at home.
Trump’s response has been unusually clear and personal. Addressing Khamenei directly, he warned that if the regime “starts shooting” protesters, the United States will “start shooting too,” promising to hit Iran “very, very hard where it hurts” without putting American boots on the ground. That conditional threat draws a bright red line: mass killing of demonstrators will not be treated as just another human‑rights complaint. For a base tired of mealy‑mouthed diplomacy, this sounds like the America First strength they voted for.
Regime Crackdown: Death Threats, Internet Blackouts, and Show of Force
Inside Iran, the regime’s playbook looks familiar: label protesters as vandals and foreign puppets, then unleash the security apparatus. Khamenei and his lieutenants have called demonstrators “mercenaries” and “vandals,” while prosecutors warn that anyone damaging property could be charged as an “enemy of God,” a capital offense. Security forces, including the Revolutionary Guard and Basij militia, are arresting hundreds, and reported death tolls range from roughly fifty to more than sixty killed, including protesters and regime forces.
Authorities have also imposed a near‑total internet and communications blackout in many areas, cutting off phone lines and data to keep images of the protests and casualties from reaching the outside world. That blackout makes it harder for families to find loved ones, for protesters to organize, and for independent groups to verify how many have been killed or detained. For Americans wary of tech‑enabled censorship and government overreach, Iran offers a stark warning of where unchecked state power and information control can lead when there is no constitutional firewall.
External Pressure and the Battle Over Narrative
As protests stretch past their second week, both sides are waging an information war. Iranian state media insists that “peace” has returned to most cities and that only small pockets of “terrorists” remain. Yet independent videos and rights groups report nightly demonstrations in Tehran neighborhoods and other cities, with chants of “Death to Khamenei” echoing through the streets. Human‑rights monitors, relying on contacts inside Iran, describe mounting casualties and escalating threats from the judiciary to impose “maximum” punishment without leniency.
Trump’s direct warning has become a central flashpoint in this narrative fight. The regime points to his statements as proof of foreign meddling, trying to discredit protesters as Western tools. Protesters, on the other hand, see vocal American backing as leverage that might make the regime hesitate before repeating its past massacres. Analysts note that Trump’s language has reportedly unsettled some Iranian officials, who now must weigh the risk that a bloody crackdown could invite U.S. military strikes against key regime assets.
Reza Pahlavi and the Question of Iran’s Political Future
Amid the chaos, exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, son of the last Shah, has stepped more forcefully into the spotlight. Speaking from abroad, he urges Iranians not only to march but to seize and hold city centers, presenting himself as a potential alternative to clerical rule and proclaiming that the day of his return is “very near.” His calls resonate with some who remember a more secular, Western‑aligned Iran, though the protest movement itself remains decentralized and lacks a single clear leader.
For American conservatives, this moment raises a deeper foreign‑policy question that cuts across party lines: should the United States simply condemn abuses, or should it actively deter tyrants from slaughtering their own people? Trump’s stance — no ground war, but real consequences if the ayatollah opens fire — reflects a blend of strength and restraint. It avoids the endless, globalist “nation‑building” many on the right reject, while still signaling that America will not sit silent if a hostile regime turns its guns on unarmed citizens.
Sources:
Iran protests live: Ayatollah and Trump clash as internet blackout deepens