🔴 Website 👉 https://u-s-news.com/
Telegram 👉 https://t.me/usnewscom_channel
Mark Zuckerberg admits to bowing to the Biden administration’s pressure to censor Pandemic content, including humor and satire, and now regrets it.
At a Glance
- Zuckerberg alleges the Biden administration pressured Meta to censor Pandemic content in 2021
- Meta removed over 20 million pieces of Pandemic related content in just over a year
- Zuckerberg expresses regret for not being more vocal about the government pressure
- The House Judiciary Committee is investigating content moderation on online platforms
- Zuckerberg vows to remain neutral in the upcoming U.S. presidential election
The Zuckerberg Confession: Big Tech’s Dance with Government Overreach
Well, folks, it seems the cat’s finally out of the bag. Mark Zuckerberg, the boy wonder of Silicon Valley, has finally grown a spine and admitted what we’ve all suspected for years: Big Tech is in bed with Big Government, and they’ve been censoring us at the behest of the Biden administration.
In a shocking revelation that has conservatives cheering and liberals squirming, Zuckerberg confessed to the House Judiciary Committee that Meta, Facebook’s parent company, was strong-armed into censoring Pandemic content, including – get this – humor and satire. Because heaven forbid we laugh during a pandemic, right?
Let’s take a moment to appreciate the irony here. The same administration that preaches about democracy and free speech was secretly pulling strings behind the scenes, turning social media giants into their personal Ministry of Truth. It’s a plot twist straight out of Orwell’s 1984, but unfortunately, this isn’t fiction – it’s our reality.
The Great Pandemic Purge: When Memes Became Public Enemy Number One
In what can only be described as a digital book burning, Meta removed over 20 million pieces of Pandemic related content in just over a year. That’s right, 20 million. Let that sink in. How many of those were legitimate concerns? How many were just jokes that some humorless bureaucrat deemed “dangerous”? We’ll never know, because Big Tech played judge, jury, and executioner at the government’s behest.
Zuckerberg, in a rare moment of candor, admitted, “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it.” Well, Mark, better late than never, I suppose. But where was this backbone when it mattered? When millions of Americans were being silenced and labeled as “misinformation spreaders” for daring to question the official narrative?
The Hunter Biden Laptop Saga: A Tale of Selective Censorship
But wait, there’s more! Zuckerberg also expressed regret over Meta’s decision to suppress the New York Post’s story about Hunter Biden’s laptop. Remember that little nugget of information that magically disappeared from social media right before the 2020 election? Turns out, it wasn’t Russian disinformation after all. Who would’ve thought?
“It’s since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story,” – Mark Zuckerberg
This admission is particularly galling when you consider the implications. A major news story with potential to influence an election was buried, not because it was false, but because it was inconvenient for a certain political party. And now, years later, we get a sheepish “oops, our bad” from Zuckerberg. Is this what passes for accountability in Silicon Valley?
The Road to Redemption: Zuckerberg’s Neutral Stance
In an apparent attempt to wash his hands of the whole debacle, Zuckerberg has declared that he will not contribute to electoral infrastructure in the upcoming U.S. presidential election. He states, “My goal is to be neutral and not play a role one way or another — or even appear to be playing a role.” That’s all well and good, Mark, but the damage is already done. The trust is broken, and a simple promise of neutrality isn’t going to fix it.
The fact is, Big Tech has shown its true colors. They’ve demonstrated a willingness to bend to government pressure and suppress free speech when it suits their agenda. And while Zuckerberg’s confession is a step in the right direction, it’s too little, too late.
The American people deserve better than half-hearted apologies and promises of future neutrality. We deserve transparency, accountability, and a commitment to upholding the principles of free speech that this nation was founded upon. Until then, we’ll be watching, Mr. Zuckerberg. And we won’t forget.